Because God did not make death, nor does he rejoice in the destruction of the living.\u00a0<\/strong>For he fashioned all things that they might have being, and<\/strong>\u00a0the creatures of the world are wholesome; there is not a destructive drug among them\u00a0<\/strong>nor any domain of Hades on earth, for righteousness is undying.\u201d \u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0(Wisdom 1:13-15)<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>God created life to be \u201cwholesome\u201d! This means, that which is conducive<\/u> to life – natural, uncontaminated, organic, ethical, clean, pure \u2013 all the things that are beneficial for one\u2019s health, physically and mentally. <\/strong><\/p>\n

So why would items such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, Polysorbate 80, monosodium glutamate, aborted fetal and animal tissues (i.e. monkey kidney cells), only a few of toxic components found in \u00a0vaccines, advertised to be safe?\u00a0(1<\/a>)\u00a0These constituents make vaccines a very destructive drug and biologically IMPOSSIBLE not to harm the human body. Toxic foreign substances are devastating to our immune system. Although we have been told \u201cvaccines are safe and effective\u201d, the law clearly considers them to be \u201cunavoidably unsafe\u201d. The word \u201cunavoidable\u201d comes straight from the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986<\/a>, which explicitly states, \u201cproducts which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite INCAPABLE OF BEING MADE SAFE.\u201d (2<\/a>,3<\/a>)\u00a0(my emphasis). If they were safe, there would not have been a need for the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program<\/a>, set up in 1988. Since vaccines cannot concurrently be both \u201csafe\u201d and \u201cunsafe\u201d, we must decide if their risk\u00a0is worth taking with our children\u2019s lives. To make this decision, we first must understand the long-term ramifications of \u201ctoxicity\u201d to the human body. (4<\/a>,5<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 2005, researchers from the Environmental Working Group (EWG) conducted a study of the umbilical cord blood from 10 newborn babies in the United States, randomly chosen by the Red Cross. (6<\/a>) It revealed that these babies had an astounding 287 chemicals within their system. The researchers stated if they had tested for a broader array of chemicals, they felt certain they would have detected far more than 287. This study represented the first reported cord blood test to show how toxic babies are today at the time of their birth. Out of the 287 chemicals detected:\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
• 217 were found to be toxic to the brain and nervous system <\/strong><\/li>\n
• 180 cause cancer in humans or animals<\/strong><\/li>\n
• 208 cause birth defects or abnormal development in animal tests<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

  Now when we further inundate these babies\u2019 overburdened body with an additional record breaking number of toxic vaccine components after birth, especially aluminum and mercury, they will possess the greatest toxic overload ever known before in history. The dangers of these pre- or post-natal exposures to such a complex mixture of carcinogens, developmental toxins, and neurotoxins, which includes toxic components used in vaccines, have NEVER BEEN STUDIED. Independently, each chemical may or may not have a harmful effect if it were the only one present. However, there is next to nothing known about their CUMULATIVE biological effect on the brain. (7<\/a>,8<\/a>) What is known is that the periods of embryonic, fetal, and infant development are remarkably susceptible to environmental hazards. Toxic exposures to chemical pollutants, during these windows of increased susceptibility, can cause disease and disability in infants, children, and across the entire span of human life. (9<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n

  Dr. Philip Landrigan is a Harvard-educated pediatrician, a decorated retired captain of the U.S. Naval Reserve, and a leading physician-advocate for children\u2019s health as it relates to the environment. Dr. Philippe Grandjean served as Professor of Neurology and Environmental Health at Boston University and later at Harvard University. He received the Bernardino Ramazzini Award<\/a> for his long career conducting and promoting environmental health research, especially his groundbreaking work on the effects of methylmercury and other environmental toxins affecting children, and for his tireless advocacy of the need to protect future generations from the devastating effects of neuro- and developmental toxins.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

  In 2006, these two researchers published a highly influential and heavily cited study in The Lancet. (10<\/a>) Their 2014 follow-up study was published in The Lancet Neurology. (11<\/a>) These researchers analyzed a range of industrial chemicals <\/strong>classifying eleven out of twelve, including mercury, as developmental neurotoxins. They believe there is a serious global, silent pandemic of neurodevelopmental toxicity taking place. These researchers stated, \u201cOur very great concern is that children worldwide are being exposed to unrecognized toxic chemicals that are <\/strong>SILENTLY <\/strong>eroding intelligence, disrupting behaviors, truncating future achievements and damaging societies.\u201d (12<\/a>) (my emphasis)\u00a0 Dr. Landrigan further stated, \u201cFor 80 percent of the common chemicals in everyday use in this country we know almost nothing about whether or not they can damage the brains of children, the immune system, the reproductive system, and the other developing organs. It\u2019s really a terrible mess we\u2019ve gotten ourselves into.\u201d (13<\/a>)\u00a0<\/strong>These are strong warnings by researchers with impeccable credentials!<\/strong><\/p>\n